Tango Night
Check out my first audio slideshow:
This first audio slideshow was a lot of fun. As long as I could be given the time and energy to go quality work, I think this is a discipline I could really warm to.
I need to work on thinking far enough ahead to the edited interview that I don’t forget to manipulate the conversation so I don’t miss crucial details. In this assignment, for example, I didn’t end up with the vital context I needed. Namely, the interviewee saying he was a UNT student who teaches tango. I think it is clear from the subtext, but it would have been better to have it up front.
As for the photographs, those could probably have been better as well, though I am pretty satisfied overall given the difficult lighting and fast movements of the dancers. I look forward to learning video, but I think I will still enjoy audio slideshows more because of the photographic element and the more nuanced storytelling.
I hope more to complete more assignements like this in the near future.
-Andrew McLemore
Chimbel-style Storytelling
This guy was scary. I can understand that the business of journalism is changing radically, but to see the intense work ethic of Aaron Chimbel was enlightening, to say the least. The sheer quantity is enough to give pause to anyone considering this field. Add to that the quality of his work and the job of a mobile journalist becomes daunting indeed. I wonder if the excitement of such a job would wear off with the constant production and inevitable anxiety.
Or maybe not so inevitable? Chimbel seemed confident and jovial enough that it is difficult to imagine him strung out. Two or three multimedia stories a day? No way. Maybe there will come a time when I can pull such a stunt, but to do so consistently? For two years? No, that remains quite out of my reach at the moment. I was very impressed with Chimbel and I am not easily impressed.
Having said that, I don’t think I want Chimbel’s job.
I know what you’re thinking, but it’s not sour grapes. I’m sure his job is very rewarding, I just don’t think the jack-of-all-trades approach is one I am particularly interested in. I will become proficient in everything I need to, but I would prefer to instill copious blood, sweat and tears into a single story than spread myself thin to fulfill a quota.
I don’t want to sound haughty or elitist. I have the greatest respect for Chimbel’s work, but my passions are the written word and photography, and these are not his strengths. Perhaps they could be, but the quick turnarounds and high-volume output he works with prevent a real sense of finesse.
Chimbel’s talent lies in the package deal. He is wonderful at video editing and camera work, enunciation and on-the-spot storytelling, concision and the discovery of novelties amenable to it. Yet a pervasive haste dominates everything and it’s not just the understanding that he is always in a hurry. His work lacks the narrative undertow that gives a story depth and meaning.
Maybe I just don’t like broadcast journalism. Anyway, I will peruse his web page on WFAA’s site from now on. To see it, click here.
Super Bowl
OK, so I really don’t care about sports and I have never seen an entire Super Bowl. But I figure a video about fans arriving in Phoenix to see the Super Bowl and paying thousands of dollars to buy tickets qualifies as something people want to see.
Most of it takes place in the parking lot, but there is plenty of decadence to keep us interested. Highlights like barbeque raccoon, a parking lot hot tub in Giants colors, and giant racks of grilled meat were ample reason to watch the entire video. All the narrative were told by the fans themselves and in accents ranging from Southern drawl to Wisconsin enunciation.
The video is about four minutes long, but there are short fade-outs that separate the mini-narratives from one another. I thought this was an effective and creative video that attracts interest with a cliche topic, but provides enough color to make it enjoyable for anyone, even those who avoid sports like disease.
Track the Media Trail
2. Investigations
“The Center for Public Interest: Investigative Journalism in the Public Interest” has a Web site with a somewhat archaic appearance. The first image of purple chess pieces and waves of neon green remind of special effects from ’80s movies.
But there are some interesting features, the most prominent of which is a search box that peruses an assembled database of FCC files and reveals what companies own the media in your neighborhood. It’s pretty nifty, though the visuals are somewhat soporific. The links are straightforward enough, but there is very little multimedia here, if any. A sidebar that breaks down the various media industries (entertainment, broadcast, newspapers, etc.) has links to graphs of annual revenues, a wonderful resource for professional investigative journalists.
The multimedia consists of lists to videos and broadcasts from various media sources. The video’s unifying theme seems to be anything that addresses evil government or evil corporations, inevitably “following the money” and exposing corruption (or sometimes just talking about the possibility of corruption).
But there are plenty of other resources here for the investigative journalist, including lists of important laws, sample open records request letters, and recent investigations.
Personal Wars on Camera
BBC’s Web site One Day of War is a great example of compelling narrative using multimedia that remains accessible to the layman. I was particularly impressed with the easy site navigation and precise writing.
The gist of the site is this: BBC journalists shot photos and video of 16 different soldiers in 16 different wars to illustrate the big picture about current conflict while still offering a human perspective. At the top of each page is an effective interface with graphics of the soldiers, their names along side and linked to articles, videos and sometimes slideshows and interactive maps.
According to the site, all of the work was done in the same 24-hour period, which is almost unbelievable considering the logistics required to achieve such a feat. It’s a creative idea that could easily have been foiled by its own complexity and certainly never accomplished with traditional tools.
But the quality of the story-telling manages to communicate the individual’s plight as well as the larger horror of brutal and often arbitray bloodletting. The photo slideshows are accompanied by short descriptions of time, place and historical context that provide insight for the tragic images of ragged men, women and children. Most of them holding firearms.
The audio was sometimes fuzzy, but I think that is understandable given the lack of time with the subjects and rough surroundings.
This is a great site I highly recommend and one that lives up the BBC’s reputation.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/programmes/this_world/one_day_of_war/html/introduction.stm
Propaganda
This video is a perfect example of the missing perspective of those who criticize American media in absolute terms. Certainly there are subjective media outlets for every possible ideology, but the graphic propaganda of this advertisement is rare in the highly regulated and politically correct media culture of the western hemisphere.
The press remains one of the least trusted institutions in this country. Though I agree that we should not place complete faith in news media, caution should not exceed the power of good judgement. Both objective and subjective news publications exist ( i.e. PBS News Hour vs. Fox News), but a choice exists for us that is absent in much of the Middle East.
I would like to know how many of the few media corporations in the Arab world have shown this ad or one like it. This kind of sensationalism breeds and perpetuates the stereotypes journalism is supposed to avoid. A key element to gauging a news station’s quality should be the avoidance of inflammatory material like this video.